图书简介

Introduction; Table of Contributors; Acknowledgments; Part 1. Negotiation; Article 1.1. Bargaining in the Shadow of the Law: The Case of Divorce (1979)--Robert H. Mnookin and Lewis Kornhauser; Comments:; Elizabeth C. Tippett--Bargaining in the Shadow of the Law: The Case for ADR as a Field of Study; Rebecca Hollander-Blumoff--Taking Human Behavior Seriously; Rishi Batra--Bargaining in the Shadow of the Law: A Classic Article with a Contemporary Challenge; Robert H. Mnookin--Bargaining in the Shadow of the Law Re-assessed; Article 1.2. Machiavelli and the Bar: Ethical Limitations on Lying in Negotiation (1980)--James J. White; Comments:; Michael Moffitt--Machiavelli and the Bar and Ethical Ratcheting; Peter R. Reilly--Machiavelli and the Bar: J.J. White as Negotiation Ethics Architect; Lauren A. Newell--Machiavelli and the Bar: Prescient in Part; James J. White--Confronting Lying in Negotiation; Article 1.3. Toward Another View of Legal Negotiation: The Structure of Problem Solving (1984)--Carrie Menkel-Meadow; Comments:; Russell Korobkin--We Are All Problem Solvers Now; Erin R. Archerd--It’s Not the Lawyers We Need to Convince: Commentary on Legal Negotiation by Carrie Menkel-Meadow; Andrea Kupfer Schneider--Counseling About More than the Law; Carrie Menkel-Meadow--The Origins of Problem Solving Negotiation and Its Use in the Present; Article 1.4. The Limits of Integrative Bargaining (1996)--Gerald B. Wetlaufer; Comments:; Jennifer Reynolds--Oversimplifying, Overselling, Overreaching; Noam Ebner--Integrative Negotiation: Paying the Price of Popularity; Robert C. Bordone--Strengthening Integrative Bargaining: How The Limits of Integrative Bargaining Sharpened the Work of Negotiation Scholars; Gerald B. Wetlaufer--Reflections on The Limits of Integrative Bargaining; Part 2. Mediation; Article 2.1. Mediation: Its Forms and Functions (1971)--Lon L. Fuller; Comments:; Art Hinshaw--Lon L. Fuller: Private Ordering and Mediation; Nancy A. Welsh--The Untethering of Mediation from Relationships; James J. Alfini--Lon Fuller’s Influence on the Debate Over Mediator Orientations; Becky L. Jacobs--Lon Fuller: A Progenitor of the Pedagogy of Skills?; Article 2.2. The Theory and Practice of Mediation: A Reply to Professor Susskind (1981)--Joseph B. Stulberg; Comments:; Lela Porter Love--A Star to Steer Her By; Brian A. Pappas--Just Settlement? Rethinking the Mediator’s Goals; Bobbi McAdoo and Sharon Press--Neutrality in 2020: A Reply to 1981 Stulberg; Joseph B. Stulberg--Revisiting Mediator Neutrality; Article 2.3. The Mediation Alternative: Process Dangers for Women (1991)--Trina Grillo; Comments:; Carol Pauli--Trina Grillo: Productive Rage; Karen Tokarz--Grillo’s Rigorous Path to Intentional, Mindful Mediation; Douglas N. Frenkel--The Grillo Effect at Thirty; Kelly Browe Olson--Post-Grillo: New Family Mediation Protections and Revised Dangers; Article 2.4. Understanding Mediators’ Orientations, Strategies, and Techniques: A Grid for the Perplexed (1996)--Leonard L. Riskin; Comments:; Michael T. Colatrella, Jr.--True Enough; Alyson Carrel--Dismantling the Facilitative Evaluative Dichotomy: Reflecting on Riskin’s Grid and Predicting the Future; Donna Erez-Navot--The Riskin Grid: A Mixed Legacy; Kimberlee Kovach--Growth from the Grid?; Part 3. Arbitration; Article 3.1. The New Federal Arbitration Law (1926)--Julius Henry Cohen and Kenneth Dayton; Comments:; Carli N. Conklin--A Robust History of Arbitration in Early America: Commentary on The New Federal Arbitration Law; Imre S. Szalai--The Federal Arbitration Act in Its Infancy: Cohen and Dayton’s The New Federal Arbitration Law; Kristen Blankley--The New Federal Arbitration Law: A Call to Ethical Practice Not Yet Realized; Amy J. Schmitz--Emphasizing Efficiency in the Digital Age; Article 3.2. Commercial Arbitration (1961)--Soia Mentschikoff; Comments:; Sarah R. Cole--Everything Old Is New Again; W. Mark C. Weidemaier--The Legacy of Soia Mentschikoff’s Commercial Arbitration; David Horton--Inside the Black Box: A Short Comment on Soia Mentschikoff’s Commercial Arbitration; Stephen J. Ware--Lasting Lessons from Mentschikoff’s Commercial Arbitration; Article 3.3. Panacea or Corporate Tool?: Debunking the Supreme Court’s Preference for Binding Arbitration (1996)--Jean R. Sternlight; Comments:; Jill I. Gross--Rethinking the Debunking: On Arbitration Myths, Preferences, and Legal Theory; Hiro N. Aragaki--The Critical Theory Legacy of Jean Sternlight’s Panacea or Corporate Tool?; Michael Z. Green--Framing the Debate to Show How Big Guys Insist That Little Guys Arbitrate as a Corporate Tool; Jean R. Sternlight--Panacea or Corporate Tool?: The Sequel; Article 3.4. Employment Arbitration: The Repeat Player Effect (1997)--Lisa B. Bingham [Lisa Blomgren Amsler]; Comments:; Alexander J.S. Colvin--The River’s Source: Empirical Research and Lisa Blomgren Amsler’s Employment Arbitration: The Repeat Player Effect; Martin H. Malin--Arbitration’s Catalyst for Empirical Studies; Richard Bales--The Historical Context of Lisa Blomgren Amsler’s Empirical Work on Employment Arbitration; Lisa Blomgren Amsler--Why the Haves Come Out Farther and Farther Ahead: The Repeat Player Effect, Control Over Dispute System Design, and Justice; Part 4. Dispute Resolution Public Policy; Article 4.1. Why the Haves Come out Ahead: Speculations on the Limits of Legal Change (1974)--Marc Galanter; Comments:; John Lande--For Pragmatic Romanticism in Law and Dispute Resolution: Reflections on Galanter’s Remarkably Realistic Analysis of Why the Have-Nots Come Out Behind; Dwight Golann--A Prescient Warning of the Vulnerabilities in ADR; Cynthia Alkon--Galanter’s Analysis of the Limits of Legal Change as Applied to Criminal Cases and Reform; Marc Galanter--Reflections on Why the Haves Come Out Ahead; Article 4.2. Varieties of Dispute Processing (1976)--Frank E. A. Sander; Comments:; Donna Shestowsky--How Useful Is Court ADR If Litigants (Still) Don’t Know About It?; Lydia Nussbaum--Dispute Processing Beyond the Courts-New Complexity, Old Problems; Deborah Thompson Eisenberg--Frank Sander: Father of Court-Based Dispute Resolution; Yael Efron--Varieties of Dispute Processing: The Implications on Legal Education; Article 4.3. Against Settlement (1984)--Owen M. Fiss; Comments:; Amy J. Cohen--ADR and Public Values Again; Ellen Waldman--What Against Settlement Got Right; Adam S. Zimmerman--From Mass Adjudication to Settlement and Back; Marjorie Corman Aaron--The Haunting Specter of Fiss’s Against Settlement; Article 4.4. Pursuing Settlement in an Adversary Culture: A Tale of Innovation Co-Opted or The Law of ADR (1991)--Carrie Menkel-Meadow; Comments:; Ellen E. Deason--Dimensions of Quality of Justice; Elayne E. Greenberg--ADR’s Place at the Justice Table; James Coben--Foundational Because Prescient (and Unfortunately, Cassandra-like Prescience); Carrie Menkel-Meadow--Institutionalizing ADR: Clashing Values

Trade Policy 买家须知